many have indicated they would like to be informed as soon as possible in the evaluation process if they had no chance for award in order to save time and expense. We have not heard that firms wish to have their initial proposals, which is what this amendment would do, have their initial proposals rejected based on less than a complete evaluation. So, this amendment really, I think, takes away that full and complete evaluation at the outset. The concern has been that offerors are encouraged to incur the expense of submitting revised proposals without the real chance of getting the award. This is addressed in H.R. 1670 by providing for increased information in the public notice so that offerors are provided, as early as possible in the process, detailed information concerning the evaluation criteria to appear in the solicitation and by granting acquisition professionals increased discretion in accordance with the announced evaluation criteria throughout the selection process. Mr. Chairman, what this basically says is that we do treat all of the applicants fairly. We do allow everybody to come in. This is not an exclusionary process. We treat them very fairly, but we do tell them up front what this is about. It also gives the Federal Government the opportunity to have some flexibility, some discretion about the way they do it.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to the evaluation process for proposals in H.R. 1670.
Share
More from William Clinger
I think we have had a very thorough debate. We are ready to vote on this matter. It is clear, there is a significant difference between us on this major issue. I would point out one thing: The gentlewoman from Illinois said not one word…
It strikes me there are analogies here to the Great Lakes initiative where we have had some indication what the cost might be, but the costs became wildly beyond anybody's wildest dreams what it might actually involve. At any rate, Mr…
I would indicate that I think a ``yes'' vote on this matter would in effect be saying that we would allow an unfunded mandate to be passed through, or open the door to passing through, an unfunded mandate to the States. Those who would…
I think this is a historic piece of legislation. It is going to be the first step in reordering the relationship between Federal and State and local governments. It is going to substantially restructure that relationship and, I think…





