It strikes me there are analogies here to the Great Lakes initiative where we have had some indication what the cost might be, but the costs became wildly beyond anybody's wildest dreams what it might actually involve. At any rate, Mr. chairman, I must oppose the amendment, as the gentleman from New Jersey has indicated, that that State, New Jersey, has adopted pathogen criteria on their water quality standards. That is certainly something every State can and perhaps should consider, but what this amendment would do would be to force that, would make other States do precisely the same thing. As I say, New Jersey may, and obviously does, consider it useful to have pathogen criteria, but other States may disagree or may have different criteria that they would prefer to pursue. Point sources do not discharge pathogens. It is a very difficult task, sometimes almost impossible, to determine the source, so it is really unclear how a State may meet a pathogen standard if forced to adopt one, which this amendment would ultimately require, a forced adoption of pathogen standards.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to water quality standards and pathogen criteria during a committee discussion.
Share
More from William Clinger
That is absolutely untrue. What we are saying is that the procurement officials, very front and center, they are very much on the front line of the decisions that they make, are going to be given a little more flexibility, a little more…
I think this is a historic piece of legislation. It is going to be the first step in reordering the relationship between Federal and State and local governments. It is going to substantially restructure that relationship and, I think…
Despite the fact the gentleman opposed my position on title I, I would say what I consider to be a very generous example of noblesse oblige, we are prepared to accept the gentleman's amendment, and I understand that any problems have been…
as I stated the day the Government Reform and Oversight Committee favorably reported this bill, I believe the district of Columbia will today move one step closer to self-sufficiency, to financial independence, perhaps even to true home…





