On the recordSeptember 12, 2013
There may be. Perhaps the Intel Committee has it. I understand there are some timelines out there that do not quite, quite match; but I do not know the answer to that. That's why we need public hearings.
Share & report
More from Tom Wolf
May 29, 2014
Madam Chair, I have no objection to the amendment. I share the opinion that NSF must exercise caution. I should tell Members, the NSF funding here is at an all-time high. This is a Republican committee, if you will. The House and we…
May 29, 2014
Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of the gentleman's amendment. As he stated better than I could, as more veterans return from combat, we are seeing their increased involvement in the justice system. The committee established the…
May 29, 2014
Madam Chair, I now make a point of order against the amendment because it provides an appropriation for an unauthorized program and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. Clause 2 of rule XXI states, in pertinent part: ``An…
May 29, 2014
Mr. Chairman, I have read that amendment. It says that you are to follow the law. I agree with that, so I accept the amendment.
Other voices in this conversation
