It would zero out EDA. Last year the House voted 305 127 to, strangely enough, increase funding for EDA by $80 million. This year, we are funding the EDA at $219.5 million, which is $38 million less than the base appropriation provided to EDA last year. Last year and this year, we in the subcommittee directed the EDA to designate a portion of its grant funding to work with companies to bring back their outsourced manufacturing activities to economically distressed communities in the United States. So we have asked them to change their whole thrust of the grants, to not do what the gentleman says--and I think he makes some valid points here--but to now have it whereby a community can work to incentivize to bring a company back from China or back from Mexico. Last year, the House voted 305 127 to increase the funding to EDA by $80 million. This year, we were at $219.5 million, $38 million less, so I urge a ``no'' vote. I yield back the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Tom Wolf
I rise in opposition to the amendment, but I do appreciate what the gentleman said. As we move on and we get to conference, there may be something we can do. I know Mr. Fattah feels the same way with regard to gang violence in the inner…
Yes. If he doesn't come up, I would. If he does not come up, I would. I will. I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, Politico talks about this case and said: The failed prosecution of an alleged Somali pirate--and the fact that that failure could leave him living freely, and permanently, inside U.S. borders--is highlighting anew the risks…
Mr. Chairman, I withdraw the point of order, and I rise in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Virginia is recognized for 5 minutes.





