I contest the point of order. Mr. Chairman, I am very disappointed that the chairman of the authorizing committee has raised a point of order against section 333 of this bill. This provision deletes the non-Federal match for the section 130 grade crossing programs. In 1999, the unobligated national balance, which was a disgrace, totaled $142 million. That means there was $142 million just lying out there for States to use for rail crossings to save lives. Many States have had difficulty expanding the section 130 funds, and as a result, some States have a few years of unobligated balances that should be used to eliminate grade crossing hazards. For example, Mr. Chairman, the State of Georgia has $9,630,879 in unobligated balances, and the State of North Carolina has $7,451,146 in unobligated balances. Deleting the non-Federal match would permit States to reduce those unobligated balances and eliminate a greater number of grade crossing hazards than previously planned, and improve safety for American families.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about a provision in a bill related to grade crossing safety funding.
Share
More from Tom Wolf
The picture on the front page of this morning's New York Times is about the latest deadly outbreak of Ebola in Africa. This horrible disease knows no borders and has already claimed the lives of 660 people in four countries since it was…
Today, I will be introducing two bills to address the most pressing national security threat since 9/11, the rapid advances made in ISIS in Iraq and Syria, as well as territorial gains made by al Qaeda-affiliated groups in Libya, Nigeria…
Reclaiming my time, I completely agree. What I will do is we will call the OSTP and ask Mr. Holdren to come up with the gentleman and get him, and you can come to the meeting, too. Quite frankly, if he doesn't come, I will offer, when we…
Out of courtesy to the gentleman from Pennsylvania, I will reserve my point of order. The Acting CHAIR. A point of order is reserved.





