I just came from a telecommunications subcommittee hearing. We are taking up the whole idea of spectrum, which to a lot of you may not sound like much, but it is the frequencies upon which we broadcast all our radios and our televisions. We are moving in this day and age toward a digital high-definition television which will enable everyone in this country to receive a movie quality picture at the same time they will have sound like you have never heard before. My point in all of this is that this discussion to move toward this new industry, which will render 250 million television sets in this Nation completely obsolete probably sometime over the next decade, began back in the 1980's. And even though I had 24 years as a broadcaster before I came to this Congress, I had not dealt with the specifics of spectrum law. And so I am very dependent upon those Members who have served here, who have been through these debates so that they can help to guide me as to where we have been in this Nation and where we are headed.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of spectrum allocation and digital television advancements.
Share
More from Ron Klink
I would ask those that are in support of PNTR, what are they willing to sacrifice on the altar of free trade. 22,000 Pennsylvania workers sacrificed their jobs. They laid their sacrifice on the altar of free trade. How much worse will it…
several years ago when we were debating on the floor of this House the North American Free Trade Agreement, we were being told by those who were proponents of that agreement that we would lose some low-skill, low-income jobs in this…
This is simply to say that before the loan goes into default that we should have some communications, that the school should be notified by the guaranty agency.
I am a pro-life Democrat, and that means, quite often, that the Democrats get mad at me because I am pro life, and the pro-life people get mad at me because I am a Democrat. But I can handle that. I say that because whether someone gets to…





