first of all, I want my friend and colleague, the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Mollohan), to know that his courage and dedication tonight are the greatest tribute he could pay to his father, and I am honored to be on the floor with him. My colleagues, this Congress had an idea that we would pass a steel quota bill and that would be our response, and we passed it with a veto-proof measure. But the same people on both sides of the aisle who had sold GATT to us back in 1994 in a lame duck session said it is not GATT compliant, that we could not do it, and they killed it. Now some of the same forces are coming out and saying we cannot do this either. Well, Mr. Speaker, our steel companies are having to compete with companies that are subsidized by foreign governments. So we want to tie both hands behind the backs of our steel industry, and we say go out and compete in the world. This is not the first time, my colleagues, that we have done subsidies. We have heard about it before. But the reality is that our basic industry needs our help. And if we let the steel industry go down, next it will be aerospace, then auto manufacturing, bridge building, construction, and on and on. We have to stand up for these workers and the 11,000 who have already lost their jobs.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the challenges faced by the steel industry and the need for support during a Congressional debate.
Share
More from Ron Klink
Chairman Goodling, and Mr. Clay, Chairman McKeon and Mr. Kildee and the rest of my former colleagues on the committee are to be congratulated for your good work on this legislation. In the larger scheme of things, H.R. 6 is good for the…
It is definitive that people born between 1917 and 1926 receive less money than those who were born between 1911 and 1916, and it can be over $200 less. We are talking about people who are between 74 years of age and 84 years of age. We…
several years ago when we were debating on the floor of this House the North American Free Trade Agreement, we were being told by those who were proponents of that agreement that we would lose some low-skill, low-income jobs in this…
But there has been a rumbling on the floor during this last week that somehow Members are being told that they are voting against their veterans in order to get bridges and highways. And that is not the intentions of Members on either side…





