we are mostly concerned with the capacity of an army of lawyers from one of the wealthiest special interest communities, the financial community of the United States, to resist the issuance of regulations. The President's existing Executive order does not really raise the question of granting the right of judicial review, because an Executive order can be changed with the strike of the pen of the President. Therefore, if we see a resistance from the industry itself to the regulations that would be propounded, the President merely has to, that day, issue a new order. Our problem in this legislation is that with it we would have to pass a new act to vitiate the right of judicial review that could tie up emergency regulations that would have to be issued to cover the entire safety and soundness of American institutions.
On the recordJanuary 27, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of executive orders and judicial review in financial regulation.
Share
More from Paul E. Kanjorski
Jul 13, 2009
I believe, in addition to empowering regulators with new and improved authority to watch over our Nation's financial health, we should also empower the owners of these companies to have more control and to align management interest with…
Jun 2, 2009
If we are going to let entities get so big with so many counterparties, then we have to have a regulator.
Jun 8, 2009
If this body is to create new regulations in the OTC markets to decrease the possibility of systemic risk and increase transparency, Congress must ensure robust competition and protect the ability of American businesses to use these…





