It is important. I just want you to recall in 1973 the President, having been dissatisfied with the investigation of the FBI and the CIA in the Watergate scandal, all he had to do was use this provision, if it were in law, and strike the appropriations and do away with the FBI and the CIA. My memory escapes me as to what the impeachment resolution vote on Nixon was in this House, But I highly doubt it was more than two-thirds. I just ask my colleagues on all sides, realize this is not just a housekeeping vehicle we are talking about today, this is a delegation of authority, legislative appropriation authority that is incredible, and allows the chief executive to reach down and punish those elements of the Government that oppose his views, whether his views are legal or constitutional, because we are arming a future President with that capacity.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislative appropriation authority during a debate.
Share
More from Paul E. Kanjorski
We need to address this problem as part of our efforts to reform the financial system to ensure financial products are adequately examined and restore investor confidence.
Their testimony was quite clear that it was their opinion that the failure of any one of them, and particularly Chrysler, would cause systemic risk if they were allowed to fail.
Part of the question I have is something I hear from many of my constituents, particularly after the most recent financial crisis in the country; they ask the question why, after mistakes are made by people in various positions of…
The pain that the majority of my constituents and probably so many constituents around the country--they are not going to trust any of us.





