I indicated about 2 weeks ago on the floor that I do not think there is going to be any surprise that the majority entertains a majority of approximately 240 votes more or less, and that all of the legislation the majority wishes to adopt in the House of Representatives will be able to be completed and concluded to its intentions. It seems to me that rather than now interfere with our relationship and our communications with our constituents, since the debate process really is not for the purposes of communicating with our constituents, or educating our constituents or ourselves for that matter, why do we not just move along with the 100-day contract over the next 2 weeks, bring it in under an hour closed rule and have it adopted so that we can get this foolishness out of the way and get on to the serious substantial business of the House of Representatives.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legislative agenda and the need to expedite the House's business.
Share
More from Paul E. Kanjorski
Their testimony was quite clear that it was their opinion that the failure of any one of them, and particularly Chrysler, would cause systemic risk if they were allowed to fail.
The ongoing financial crisis has made it apparent to nearly everyone that we must move the over-the-counter derivatives market from one that takes place under the table to one that happens out in the open.
If we are serious about promoting economic stimulus and recovery, then we must address the credit crisis that is paralyzing our state and local governments' capital programs.
We can fundamentally change some of this system to make it fairer, better, and more equitable.





