Mr. Chairman, I do not want to delay this. I know what my friend, the gentleman from Pennsylvania, wants to accomplish. I want to assure him that in the amendment as published in section 306, the savings provision covers exactly what he should worry about, in that we do not interfere or supersede with any existing law operation. As a matter of fact, in setting this up, I worked a great deal with my friend, the gentleman from West Virginia, Mr. Mollohan's transfer center in West Virginia. It is an ideal type of operation. We want to encourage that type of operation. Mr. Chairman, there is nothing in this law that interferes with or supplements existing law. What it does is allows us to cover the loopholes in the law. Mr. Chairman, what I would suggest as to why we cannot accept the amendment of the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Walker] is that the gentleman's amendment prevents the labs from using the services.
On the recordMay 11, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to a law during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Paul E. Kanjorski
Aug 2, 1999
I am proud to join with the community in thanking them for their years of service and wishing them the best for the future.
May 20, 2010
It is my honor to introduce to you and to our colleagues today our newest member of the Pennsylvania delegation, Mark Critz. Congressman Critz is a dedicated public servant to the people of western Pennsylvania. For more than a decade…
May 12, 1994
Mr. Chairman, I understand the desire of the proponent of the amendment to constrain the expenses in the budget, and I sympathize with that. But here we are in a multiyear authorization and we are talking about how many base closures there…





