Political Quotes

On the recordMay 17, 2007
this amendment is drawn for the purposes of clarifying the process used by the new regulator's advisory committee to recommend candidates to serve as independent directors on the boards of each of the Federal Home Loan Banks. This proposal is a simple, yet important, corporate governance reform. Today, the Federal Home Loan Banks benefit from the service and the guidance of individuals appointed by the regulator to serve on the boards of each of the Federal Home Loan Banks in addition to those board directors elected by member financial institutions. Because the public-private partnership in guiding and monitoring the activities of a Federal Home Loan Bank is an important one, H.R. 1427 would preserve the election and appointment systems for constituting the Federal Home Loan Bank boards. Under the bill the advisory committee would recommend a list of individuals to serve as appointed independent directors to the head of the new regulatory agency. This individual would then make the final determination about whom to appoint to the independent director seats on the boards of each of the Federal Home Loan Banks. Independent directors help to focus a Federal Home Loan Bank on its statutory mission. These public appointees also help to ensure that each board has the knowledge, skills, and expertise needed to properly direct and supervise the management of the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Said by
Paul E. Kanjorski
Pennsylvania

Editor's note · Context

Discussing an amendment related to the governance of the Federal Home Loan Banks.

Share

More from Paul E. Kanjorski

May 19, 2009

I believe this legislation is vital to maintaining the health and stability of our financial systems.

congress.gov
Jun 2, 2009

Who says that the government should have a role in ownership of real estate?

congress.gov
Jun 8, 2009

The ongoing financial crisis has made it apparent to nearly everyone that we must move the over-the-counter derivatives market from one that takes place under the table to one that happens out in the open.

congress.gov
Jul 20, 2009

Their testimony was quite clear that it was their opinion that the failure of any one of them, and particularly Chrysler, would cause systemic risk if they were allowed to fail.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation