I do not want to suggest it is only, but we do have a solid block that is clearly a majority. They are going to prevail. Let me suggest maybe we can save a lot of frustration and time, and that is why do we not take the next 2 weeks on the entire Contract With America, bring it here on the floor. Why should we offer any amendments if they are not going to be considered as substantive and changing the legislation to perhaps meet the needs of the American people, but recognize the power of the majority, and it is all here and we have that majority, why do not we just run through the entire contract for America in 2 weeks, get that behind us, and then get to the substantive action? I would like to suggest to my friends in the majority that they set aside, maybe beginning next week, a 10-day period, bring every piece of legislation that they have to the floor, let us put it up to a vote.
On the recordJanuary 30, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Proposing a streamlined approach to passing the Contract With America during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Paul E. Kanjorski
Feb 24, 2010
And colleagues, I rise today to honor our friend and one of the outstanding Members of this House, Jack Murtha, who represented Pennsylvania's 12th district, and to remember his devotion to his work in this Congress, his strength of…
May 20, 2010
It is my honor to introduce to you and to our colleagues today our newest member of the Pennsylvania delegation, Mark Critz. Congressman Critz is a dedicated public servant to the people of western Pennsylvania. For more than a decade…
Jun 2, 2009
We have to get back to 'good regulation.' Maybe we even have to go a little beyond that and say, we need to get back to good values.





