It sends a message that politics will be valued over science.
Editor's note · Context
Cartwright warns that political interests are prioritized over scientific integrity.
Share
More from Matt Cartwright
I have one final question for Ranking Member Larson. This idea of raising the retirement age, as the gentleman has explained very well, constitutes a cut in benefits for every year Republicans raise it. Economists have worked out how much…
So here we are 10 years on, and I want you to know I was an original cosponsor of that in 2014, and I was proud to do it, and I thank you for dreaming this whole idea up because it is so important. We know that it is the retirement of the…
For the reasons previously stated, this amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Norman). The amendment was agreed…
The amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. Ogles). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment No. 83 Offered by Mr. Ogles…





