Madam Chair, on the one point about 99.9 percent of crashes settling within existing insurance minimums, there we have the opponents of my amendment speaking really out of both sides of their mouth, because if they say it is so rare that a crash will cost more than the minimum insurance, then what that means is that the expense of insuring against that minimal risk has to be minimal itself, but these are the same people saying that it will be a crippling additional insurance premium. It doesn't make sense.
Share & report
More from Matt Cartwright
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this particular amendment, which would block a rule that promotes meaningful shareholder engagement by requiring a higher level of shareholder support for resubmitted proposals. This rule helps…
Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. The SEC guidance that this rule would block provides clearer guidance for companies for disclosure of non-generally accepted accounting principles, non-GAAP. This clarity helps investors…
How is the EPA supporting communities in their efforts to address stormwater runoff?
We are kind of coming up on a similar thing right now. We have broadband internet access in most places in this country right now, but there are places being left behind.





