Its request for this court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas' referred candidate for president is legally indefensible and is an affront to principles of constitutional democracy.
Josh Shapiro emphasized the legal flaws in Texas's request to the Supreme Court regarding the election.
Share & report
More from Josh Shapiro
[The bill] would have a devastatingly negative impact on Pennsylvania. I've been very outspoken about that, and really specific about the harm it would do to Pennsylvanians.
I refuse to accept that you’ve got to attack your fellow Americans in order to win an election, and I simply won’t engage in that.
Using the rhetoric of rage and calling some of our fellow Americans ‘scum’ — no matter how profound our differences — only creates more division and makes it harder to heal.
This new law is about real freedom: the freedom to hunt, the freedom for families to pass down traditions to the next generation, and the freedom for the Pennsylvania Game Commission — the experts who know our hunters and our wildlife best…
Other voices in this conversation
