When this legislation was passed, special education is a mandate that every child receives the same kind of education, the same quality of education. Some people with serious problems are a lot more expensive to educate than those who do not have those difficulties. Yet, just back in 1996, if I look at this correctly, we were only paying 3.5 percent of special education costs. If my memory is correct, the legislation that was passed by this Congress before that some years said we would pay 40 percent of the costs of special education. We were at 3.5, and I think we are up to, looking at that chart it is a little hard to tell, it is over 6. So we have almost doubled the Federal commitment. These are dollars that follow the student and go to all of our schools. That is not true of all Federal money. Much of the Federal education dollar is not spread equally across this country. Some large urban districts do pretty well. There are a few suburban districts which do pretty well. I have lots of districts that get 1 percent of their funding. Yet, we say we are funding 6.8 percent of education. So the biggest frustration I have had with Federal programs is the complexity.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing special education funding and federal commitment to education.
Share
More from John W. Peterson
I find the testimony from the gentleman from New York interesting. He mentioned pellet stoves, one of the new future heat. 800,000 Americans now heat their homes with a pellet stove. There's 30 or 40 pellet mills sprung up around the…
In fairness to those countries, they're producing more and more energy, and we have chosen not to produce very much of our own only in the whole entire fields. And yet we pass a bill so we think we can sue them because they're not…
If the Democrats win this debate and we don't produce energy--if we use these old statements of 68 million acres and 80 something percent is leased, that is not factual; 2.5 percent of the Outer Continental Shelf is leased, the good spots…
And if carbon capture and CO<INF>2</INF>, if you have those who believe that's such an evil force, that the CO<INF>2</INF> we breathe out is a poisonous gas, if we put carbon capture and CO<INF>2</INF> payments ahead of affordable…





