Mr. Chairman, it has been my experience in the 6 years that I have served in this House that there is not a Member of the House of Representatives who is more courteous, who is more respectful of his colleagues, who is more polite than the gentleman from Connecticut. He is a gentleman par excellence, and his motives in that regard should not be questioned. Mr. Chairman, it was clear that his concern simply was that in the format where we each seek 5 minutes and an infinite number of yields might prevent others from having an opportunity to speak. And it was only, I know, because of his courteous respect for his colleagues that he made that point and I think that should be clarified. On the merits of severability, the gentleman from California (Mr. Thomas), neither he nor the proponents of his amendment have yet made the case that the elements of the Shays-Meehan bill, in fact, hinge upon and were dependent upon one another. The fact of the matter is that they are not.
Editor's note · Context
Defending a colleague's decorum and addressing the merits of an amendment during House debate.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
it's clear and it's obvious that their intention is to kill as many infidels and apostates as they possible can.
I think it is sad and it is distasteful when we hear this kind of rhetoric that questions the motives of Members of the House, that makes such ridiculous statements as Republicans want to end Medicare. What a stupid thing to say…
Mr. Speaker, this bill, as has been mentioned by the chairman, passed just about a month ago by the overwhelming margin of 338 to 86 in this House and, in fact, it passed in the Senate unanimously. So today we pass the Senate version of…
I oppose the Ney substitute because I believe it and the amendment thereto to follow will kill our crusade against soft money, and our crusade against soft money has to win if our democracy is to prevail. There are those who say that soft…





