the previous speaker and most of the opponents of this bill have acknowledged that we have a crisis, a crisis that has to be resolved, and unfortunately, they have not articulated an alternative to our proposal, only their criticisms of it. The fact of the matter is that this bill tips the scales back so that they are in balance. This bill allows 100 percent of economic damages, millions and millions of dollars of damages available to plaintiffs for their health care and their lost wages and many, many other economic damages. It puts a cap as a floor of $250,000 for noneconomic, noncalculable economic damages and allows every State in the union that wants to raise that to wherever they see fit. This is the opportunity now to decide whether this House will stand up to the crisis and solve it or turn its head and let it fester for another 20 years.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a proposed bill addressing a crisis and its economic implications.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
I yield myself 10 seconds to note that the Stanford University professor who was just quoted, Steven Mosher, was kicked out of Stanford in the 1980s for academic fraud and misappropriation of university funds.
I think it is sad and it is distasteful when we hear this kind of rhetoric that questions the motives of Members of the House, that makes such ridiculous statements as Republicans want to end Medicare. What a stupid thing to say…
it is fitting that this new hour follows that last 5-minute presentation which was a perfectly classic example of partisan rhetoric aimed more to gain political favor than to shed light on an issue. What we are going to do for the next…
America's place in the world, our leadership place in the world, is derived in many respects from the character of our people. It is derived in large measure from the nature and the beauty of our Constitution; but it is also derived in no…





