Peter Keisler has waited for 650 days, and soon, it will be the 2-year anniversary of his nomination. So the real question is not fairness to Republicans; it is a question of fairness to the American people. The American people have not been treated fairly, and they have not been treated fairly by the Democrats, and they weren't treated fairly by Republicans when President Clinton sent nominees to this floor. It is high time this stops. That is why I have introduced a resolution that would establish a protocol. The protocol would be, after a nominee is nominated, there be a hearing and then there is a committee vote. Then, the nominee comes before the full Senate and we start to follow the Constitution. There is nothing in the Constitution about filibusters. The Constitution talks about the President's prerogatives to nominate and the Senate's duty to consent or not to consent. The majority leader made a big to-do about its being a matter of quality, not a matter of quantity. Well, if the majority doesn't like the quality, all they have to do is vote the nominee down. All I am asking for is up-or-down votes. If they don't like the quality, say so. Say so. I think that, on an examination of the record, there would be no real issue about quality. These are quality people. But, if I am wrong, and their judgment is to the contrary, I will abide by that. Vote no. Don't consent. Follow the Constitution and don't consent.
Arlen Specter: “Peter Keisler has waited for 650 days, and soon, it will be the 2-year anniversary of his nomination. So the real…”
On the recordApril 10, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination process and advocating for fair treatment of nominees.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Mar 16, 2014
I cannot applaud Rutland enough, because we had a similar hearing a few years ago when Senator Arlen Specter and I were here, and that shaped a number of federal programs for the better because of what we heard from you.
Dec 5, 2011
Because it is so important for the public to know how its Government functions, and because the Supreme Court affects the lives of Americans in such great detail.
Nov 29, 2010
One other point briefly--I see a colleague awaiting an opportunity to speak--and that is my hope we will address, before the end of the year, the issue of televising the proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. This is an…





