I would not hesitate to do so again if I agreed, but I cannot agree with the language requiring that not later than 120 days after enactment to have phased redeployment of U.S. forces, with the goal of redeploying by March 31, 2008, all U.S. combat forces in Iraq. The thrust of the language in the bill, however, is to leave Iraq in a year, something that will ensure defeat--as setting a timetable simply enables our opponents to wait us out.
Arlen Specter: “I would not hesitate to do so again if I agreed, but I cannot agree with the language requiring that not later than 120…”
On the recordMarch 27, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to U.S. military redeployment in Iraq.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Dec 17, 2010
I have sought recognition to introduce today a bill that strengthens the Armed Career Criminal Act in response to a series of Supreme Court rulings, which wrongly have restricted when and how the Act is applied, and have caused unnecessary…
Dec 15, 2010
I have sought recognition to introduce the Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2010. This legislation was originally filed as an amendment, number 4693, to the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act S. 510, but did not receive a vote…
Dec 5, 2011
I believe that it is vital that the public really understands what the Supreme Court does.





