I intend to oppose cloture on the National Competitiveness Act of 1993. I would like to articulate my reasons for that judgment, because I think that opposing cloture, otherwise known as a filibuster, should be employed only on rare occasions in the Senate, because I firmly believe in the majority rule, that is 51 votes out of 100 and not to require 60 votes. But I have come to this conclusion because of my views that this bill is too expensive in its present form, but fundamentally on my response to the tactics of the majority. Last night's debate I found very unfortunate. I decided not to respond in the heat of the moment, but to reflect on the matter overnight. But, essentially, the Senator from South Carolina, who is on the floor, I found his comments about the Senator from Missouri unwarranted, unprofessional, and unsenatorial.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing cloture on the National Competitiveness Act of 1993 during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
I have sought recognition to speak in favor of my amendment No. 4693 to the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act S.510 to permit emergency scheduling of designer anabolic steroids. Anabolic steroids--masquerading as body building dietary…
I have sought recognition to urge my colleagues to support and take up next Congress the bill I just introduced, the Restoration of Legal Rights for Claimants Under Holocaust-Era Insurance Policies. The bill would restore the right of…
Because it is so important for the public to know how its Government functions, and because the Supreme Court affects the lives of Americans in such great detail.
last year I introduced the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, H.R. 1504. As I explained in my accompanying floor statement, my objective was to restore the pleading standard that had governed federal civil practice if not since the…





