I join the Senator from Louisiana in his request to have a hearing and then proceed with an up-or-down vote. I have reviewed the record of the nominee. It appears to me that the nominee is qualified for the position. In his service as a U.S. attorney, he has already had Senate confirmation. But the basic proposition of having a hearing and a vote, I think, is very fundamental to so many pending nominees beyond the nominee addressed by the Senator from Louisiana today. I have discussed this issue on a number of occasions with the senior Senator from Louisiana, and she has been of the view that she ought not to return the blue slip, and I respect her decision. But I also respect the position of Senator Vitter in trying to move forward. It would be my hope that we could come to some accommodation, that we could find some way to set a timetable for a hearing, at least on that.
Arlen Specter: “I join the Senator from Louisiana in his request to have a hearing and then proceed with an up-or-down vote. I have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a hearing and vote on a judicial nominee.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
I had spoken about this when we reconvened several weeks ago, that it is my hope that Congress, the Senate specifically, will take up legislation which I have introduced which would authorize the use of Federal funding for embryonic stem…
I have sought recognition to introduce today a bill that strengthens the Armed Career Criminal Act in response to a series of Supreme Court rulings, which wrongly have restricted when and how the Act is applied, and have caused unnecessary…
I urge my colleagues to move ahead with the prompt ratification of this treaty. I have long been interested in the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, predecessor to Russia, on the issue of arms control, going back…
Not only does the Court affect the daily lives of all Americans, it has a tremendous impact upon the separation of powers.





