I believe that is a mistake. If they want to attach political blame to the President if the program should lapse, ultimately, we will have a negotiation because the American people would see through the facade and understand that those who refuse to negotiate are the ones responsible if the program lapses and is terminated. We will take care of congressional and Federal action for children's health. What the amendment seeks to do is to eliminate earmarks. Earmarks have a specific congressional designation budget-wise and are vitally important projects, such as the dredging of the Delaware in Philadelphia to provide a 45-foot channel which traditionally has been the responsibility of the Federal Government under constitutional provisions on waterways and related matters. It would eliminate flood control, which is vital. It would eliminate many items where there is congressional expertise and understanding.
Arlen Specter: “I believe that is a mistake. If they want to attach political blame to the President if the program should lapse…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of negotiating on children's health care and the implications of eliminating earmarks.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
This Convention has been ratified by 186 of the 193 countries involved, and it is a very important statement of international policy to respect the rights of women and to advance the cause of women.
I have sought recognition to introduce today a bill that strengthens the Armed Career Criminal Act in response to a series of Supreme Court rulings, which wrongly have restricted when and how the Act is applied, and have caused unnecessary…
I have sought recognition to speak in favor of my amendment No. 4693 to the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act S.510 to permit emergency scheduling of designer anabolic steroids. Anabolic steroids--masquerading as body building dietary…





