I am unable to support the amendment by my colleagues Senator Smith and Senator Boxer to arm pilots on commercial flights because I am concerned that such a proposal would invite gun fights in the cockpit. I believe that federal air marshals are the individuals best suited to handle any terrorist situation which might arise on a flight, and am fully supportive of providing the financial resources necessary to hire additional air marshals. Although this amendment would provide significant training for pilots to handle firearms, I remain concerned that in an emergency situation their concentration should be focused on flying the plane, not dealing with attackers in the passenger cabin. I do strongly support the provision in the amendment which would provide self-defense training for flight attendants, however I simply do not believe it is worth the risk to have the availability of guns in the cockpit which could fall into terrorist hands.
Arlen Specter: “I am unable to support the amendment by my colleagues Senator Smith and Senator Boxer to arm pilots on commercial…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to arm pilots on commercial flights during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
I have sought recognition to urge my colleagues to support and take up next Congress the bill I just introduced, the Restoration of Legal Rights for Claimants Under Holocaust-Era Insurance Policies. The bill would restore the right of…
I do not think we are being too assertive if we say to the Supreme Court, 'Televise.'
I have sought recognition to introduce the Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2010. This legislation was originally filed as an amendment, number 4693, to the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act S. 510, but did not receive a vote…
this is not a farewell address but, rather, a closing argument to a jury of my colleagues and the American people outlining my views on how the Senate and, with it, the Federal Government arrived at its current condition of partisan…





