Isn't the flat statement by the Supreme Court, speaking through Justice Stevens, that "aliens held at base, no less than American citizens, are entitled to invoke the Federal Courts' authority under section 2241"--albeit that is a statute and the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has tried to sidestep the court opinion in Rasul by saying it was a holding on a statute which the Congress can change, and denies the very strong language of the court in saying that there is a right which was established at the time of 1789, and the Constitution speaks explicitly of the ways to suspend the right, so there is a constitutional right--but taking that language, "aliens held at base, no less than American citizens, are entitled to invoke the Federal Courts' authority under section 2241,"--isn't that conclusive that aliens are entitled to invoke the habeas corpus rights under the Constitution?
Arlen Specter: “Isn't the flat statement by the Supreme Court, speaking through Justice Stevens, that "aliens held at base, no less than…”
On the recordMarch 8, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the rights of aliens in relation to U.S. courts during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Nov 17, 2010
We have a requirement, as you may know, for 60 Senators to be in agreement before a bill is taken up, and some people--we were two votes short.
Jan 2, 2017
the reason we serve is to ensure that our children and our children's children inherit the same great country that we received from those who went before us.
Dec 5, 2011
The Congress has the authority to handle administrative matters legislatively.
Nov 29, 2010
I urge my colleagues to move ahead with the prompt ratification of this treaty. I have long been interested in the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, predecessor to Russia, on the issue of arms control, going back…





