I do want a response, but not in the middle of my sentence or the middle of my question. But to go forward here on the availability of Federal civil remedies in cases not involving medically reviewable decisions, this covers, line 24-25: regarding whether an item of service is covered under the terms and conditions of the plan or coverage,[.] My question to the Senator from Massachusetts: Isn't that an explicit conclusive statement that, if it is a matter of interpreting a contract as to what service is covered under the terms and conditions of the plan or coverage, that is a Federal remedy? That is what it says in black and white, doesn't it? I ask Senator Kennedy.
Arlen Specter: “I do want a response, but not in the middle of my sentence or the middle of my question. But to go forward here on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing federal civil remedies related to health care coverage during Senate debate.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
We are trying to make sure that we have maximum impact in the places that could use the money the most.
Because it is so important for the public to know how its Government functions, and because the Supreme Court affects the lives of Americans in such great detail.
I have every confidence that Jeff Sessions will execute the office of Attorney General honestly, faithfully, and fully in the pursuit of justice.
I cannot applaud Rutland enough, because we had a similar hearing a few years ago when Senator Arlen Specter and I were here, and that shaped a number of federal programs for the better because of what we heard from you.





