this resolution provides that Social Security cost-of-living adjustments shall be maintained. The resolution (S. Res. 155) was agreed to. The preamble was agreed to. The resolution, with its preamble, reads as follows: S. Res. 155 (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that: (1) Social Security provides a relatively modest insurance benefit for seniors--many of whom rely on Social Security for part or all of their monthly income. Without Social Security, forty-eight percent of beneficiaries would be in poverty today. (2) In order to protect benefit levels against inflation, Social Security beneficiaries receive an annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) based on Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). (3) The January 2003 COLA provided only a 1.4 percent increase in Social Security benefits, increasing the average monthly benefit for all retired workers by only $13 (from $882 to 895). (4) Annual growth in Medicare premiums and out-of-pocket health care costs for retired individuals on fixed incomes far exceeded the small COLA increases provided to Social Security beneficiaries. (5) Reducing COLAs will disproportionately harm low-income Social Security beneficiaries and push millions of seniors into poverty. (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that Social Security cost-of-living adjustments should not be reduced.
Arlen Specter: “this resolution provides that Social Security cost-of-living adjustments shall be maintained. The resolution (S. Res.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a resolution to maintain Social Security cost-of-living adjustments.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
I urge my colleagues to move ahead with the prompt ratification of this treaty. I have long been interested in the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, predecessor to Russia, on the issue of arms control, going back…
I think Senator Sessions has it right when he says they consider it their domain. Well, it is not.
I have sought recognition to comment briefly about the START Treaty, the consideration of which is now pending before the Senate, and to urge my colleagues to move forward to ratify this important treaty. I have long been interested in the…
The Polman article recites a number of Senators who voted no against proceeding with the DISCLOSE Act, having made in the past very forceful affirmative statements in favor of disclosure. It may be that by reminding those 4 Senators…





