I agree with him the earlier language which exists presently, categorizing national security generally and consistent with national security requirements and considerations, is the broader language. I do not think the additional language of terrorism seeks to limit that, but I think the Senator from Tennessee raises a good point that it ought to be clarified so the national security considerations are broader than just terrorism.
Discussing national security language and its implications during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
We are trying to make sure that we have maximum impact in the places that could use the money the most.
Because it is so important for the public to know how its Government functions, and because the Supreme Court affects the lives of Americans in such great detail.
Senator Specter cited just one. It was his vote against confirming Jeff Sessions as a Federal judge.
The reason we serve is to ensure our children and our children's children inherit the same great country that we received from those who went before us.
Other voices in this conversation
