That is acceptable, provided those on the floor can muster a no which either exceeds the ayes or is so recognized by the Chair to be the predominant voice vote. I call for the question on a voice vote. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion to waive the Budget Act in relation to amendment No. 2223. In the opinion of the Chair, the motion has failed and the Senate has not obtained the three-fifths majority necessary for passage. The point of order is sustained, and the amendment falls.
Arlen Specter: “That is acceptable, provided those on the floor can muster a no which either exceeds the ayes or is so recognized by the…”
Share
More from Arlen Specter
The Polman article recites a number of Senators who voted no against proceeding with the DISCLOSE Act, having made in the past very forceful affirmative statements in favor of disclosure. It may be that by reminding those 4 Senators…
last year I introduced the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, H.R. 1504. As I explained in my accompanying floor statement, my objective was to restore the pleading standard that had governed federal civil practice if not since the…
I have sought recognition to introduce the Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2010. This legislation was originally filed as an amendment, number 4693, to the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act S. 510, but did not receive a vote…
I think Senator Sessions has it right when he says they consider it their domain. Well, it is not.





