I do that to avoid having a principle established where lenders in the future will be unwilling to loan money for mortgages if they think the bankruptcy court has the authority to reduce the principal over their objection. But if the lender agrees to it--and I think it is important because the bankruptcy court would not have the authority to reduce the principal unless there is the provision I have by obtaining the lender's agreement. But the principle that the Senator from Illinois seeks to reduce the principal sum, I think, is sound, so long as you do not destroy the ability of the lender to control it so as to not discourage future lenders.
Arlen Specter: “I do that to avoid having a principle established where lenders in the future will be unwilling to loan money for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of a bankruptcy bill related to mortgage principal reduction.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
The Polman article recites a number of Senators who voted no against proceeding with the DISCLOSE Act, having made in the past very forceful affirmative statements in favor of disclosure. It may be that by reminding those 4 Senators…
I think Senator Sessions has it right when he says they consider it their domain. Well, it is not.
I do not think we are being too assertive if we say to the Supreme Court, 'Televise.'
this is not a farewell address but, rather, a closing argument to a jury of my colleagues and the American people outlining my views on how the Senate and, with it, the Federal Government arrived at its current condition of partisan…





