I am prepared to honor the President's request that we vote on this matter before we adjourn, but I think we ought to take the time to debate that need. There are a great many questions to be answered. We do not want to repeat the mistakes of not going after bin Laden, as we had good cause to prior to 9/11. We have learned a bitter lesson from September 11, and we had cause to act in advance. There is another issue I mention briefly before concluding, and that is the difference in language between the 1991 resolution, which says the President is authorized to use the Armed Forces in order to achieve the implementation of Security Council resolutions, and contrast it with the language of the two resolutions which are now pending, the resolution introduced by Senator Lieberman and another resolution introduced by Senators Daschle and Lott which say the President is authorized to use all means he determines to be appropriate.
Arlen Specter: “I am prepared to honor the President's request that we vote on this matter before we adjourn, but I think we ought to…”
On the recordOctober 7, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for debate before voting on military action related to Iraq.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Sep 11, 2012
Congressional legislation 'doesn't amount to anything if the president can say, 'My constitutional authority supersedes the statute.'
Dec 22, 2010
last year I introduced the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, H.R. 1504. As I explained in my accompanying floor statement, my objective was to restore the pleading standard that had governed federal civil practice if not since the…
Dec 9, 2010
I wish to recognize MAJ Lance Burnett's service to his country and as an Air Force fellow on my staff. Major Burnett joined my office through the Congressional Fellows Program. Over the past year, he has been an invaluable addition to my…





