Political Quotes

Arlen Specter: I am reintroducing the text of S. 4051, which I originally introduced on November 14 of last year. And the title…

On the recordJanuary 4, 2007
I am reintroducing the text of S. 4051, which I originally introduced on November 14 of last year. And the title articulates it in a succinct way, so I will read that. It is: a bill to provide sufficient resources to permit electronic surveillance of United States persons for foreign intelligence purposes to be conducted pursuant to individualized court-issued warrants for calls originating in the United States, to provide additional resources to enhance oversight and streamline the procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and to ensure review of the Terrorist Surveillance Program by the United States Supreme Court. I made a number of efforts in the 109th Congress to subject the President's surveillance program to judicial review in accordance with the existing law that a search-and-seizure warrant or a wiretap ought not to be issued without a judge making a finding of probable cause and authorizing that kind of a search and seizure or that kind of a wiretap. Without going into the entire history, that bill was refined to the point where it is articulated in S. 4051 of the 109th Congress, which would provide for individualized warrants for calls originating in the United States and going out. That can be accomplished, according to the CIA, if there are additional resources, which this bill provides, and if the time for retroactive approval is extended from 3 days to 7 days.
Said by
Arlen Specter
Democratic · Pennsylvania

Editor's note · Context

Reintroducing S. 4051 to enhance oversight of electronic surveillance and ensure judicial review.

Share

More from Arlen Specter

Nov 17, 2010

Regrettably, this Convention is not at the top of the list.

congress.gov
Dec 21, 2010

I have sought recognition to comment briefly about the START Treaty, the consideration of which is now pending before the Senate, and to urge my colleagues to move forward to ratify this important treaty. I have long been interested in the…

govinfo.gov
Dec 5, 2011

The Court is very ideologically driven at the moment, and I think the public needs to understand that.

congress.gov
Dec 5, 2011

I do not think we are being too assertive if we say to the Supreme Court, 'Televise.'

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation