we would be glad to respond after we see the amendments. We may need more time. We haven't seen the amendments. That has been a problem continuously, not having seen the amendments. I repeat to the Senator from Louisiana, if we can see the amendments, we can answer the question.
Arlen Specter: “we would be glad to respond after we see the amendments. We may need more time. We haven't seen the amendments. That has…”
On the recordMay 18, 2006
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Arlen Specter
Nov 18, 2010
I have sought recognition to speak in favor of my amendment No. 4693 to the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act S.510 to permit emergency scheduling of designer anabolic steroids. Anabolic steroids--masquerading as body building dietary…
Dec 5, 2011
Because it is so important for the public to know how its Government functions, and because the Supreme Court affects the lives of Americans in such great detail.
Dec 22, 2010
last year I introduced the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2009, H.R. 1504. As I explained in my accompanying floor statement, my objective was to restore the pleading standard that had governed federal civil practice if not since the…





