Arlen Specter actually said...

I think these rules need transparency, need strengthening, et cetera, but I think it would be a mistake for a complete prohibition.

I think the hearing has been very useful in covering the consensus on public disclosure without any complex definitions.

Are you not in a position, knowing that, to impose a sanction if one is appropriate?

Would not at minimum those individuals fit into the category of the kind of responsibilities which would warrant public disclosures?