I am opposed to cloture of the Lieberman bill until I have a chance to offer that amendment. I have also voted against cloture on the Gramm-Miller bill because, again, although I have had discussions with Senator Gramm, as I have had discussions with Senator Lieberman, we have not reached fruition. I want an opportunity to include this language about the intelligence directorate on the Gramm-Miller amendment. While I have not taken a position, as I said on Thursday, on whether I will ultimately support the Nelson-Chafee-Breaux amendment, which is backed by labor, or whether I will support the Gramm-Miller amendment, which is the President's preference, it is my hope we can yet work out an accommodation. But I think it is much more important the Senate pass a bill and we go to conference with the House, whichever provisions are included. I grant the provisions labor wants included are important to labor, and I grant the provisions the President wants included are important to the President. But as important as all of those provisions are, they are not as important as getting a bill that can be conferenced with the House, which can be signed by the President, so we can set up this Department of Homeland Security and we can have, under one umbrella, all of the intelligence agencies.
Arlen Specter: “I am opposed to cloture of the Lieberman bill until I have a chance to offer that amendment. I have also voted against…”
On the recordSeptember 30, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing cloture on the Lieberman and Gramm-Miller bills while advocating for a comprehensive Homeland Security bill.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Dec 5, 2011
I do not think we are being too assertive if we say to the Supreme Court, 'Televise.'
Mar 16, 2014
I cannot applaud Rutland enough, because we had a similar hearing a few years ago when Senator Arlen Specter and I were here, and that shaped a number of federal programs for the better because of what we heard from you.
Dec 17, 2010
I have sought recognition to introduce today a bill that strengthens the Armed Career Criminal Act in response to a series of Supreme Court rulings, which wrongly have restricted when and how the Act is applied, and have caused unnecessary…





