I had hoped to make this floor statement in advance of the vote, but I could not be here yesterday. So, I have asked for time this morning to state my reasons for voting against the omnibus appropriations bill. And I do so with a conflict of my own views because I think this bill provides very substantial funding for very many important projects. However, I decided to vote against the bill because of the change from regular order and existing procedures in the appropriations process. The Constitution gives the authority to 100 Members of the Senate and 435 Members of the House, but as the appropriations process went forward the final decisions were made by only four Members.
Arlen Specter: “I had hoped to make this floor statement in advance of the vote, but I could not be here yesterday. So, I have asked for…”
On the recordOctober 21, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Explaining his reasons for voting against the omnibus appropriations bill.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Dec 21, 2010
this is not a farewell address but, rather, a closing argument to a jury of my colleagues and the American people outlining my views on how the Senate and, with it, the Federal Government arrived at its current condition of partisan…
Dec 5, 2011
I think the public's right to know and the benefit of an informed citizenry vastly outweigh what you quote Justice Kennedy as talking about collegial dynamics.
Dec 5, 2011
I think Senator Sessions has it right when he says they consider it their domain. Well, it is not.
Dec 5, 2011
The authority of the Congress under the Commerce Clause was unchallenged for 60 years and then in Lopez and Morrison cut back.





