On the recordJuly 20, 2006
I seek recognition to elaborate upon views expressed earlier today by several of my colleagues. Senators McConnell, Hatch, Kyl, and Cornyn engaged in a colloquy regarding the meaning of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act reauthorization bill presently before this body. I wish to express my agreement with those comments and add a few thoughts of my own. Section 5 of the proposed bill overturns two Supreme Court cases: Reno v. Bossier Parish, or Bossier Parish II, and Georgia v. Ashcroft. The goal of the bill is to protect districts that contain a majority of minority voters. We are well aware of efforts in the past to disenfranchise minority voters. As a consequence, this language prohibits legislators from acting purposely, with the intention of harming minority voters, to ``unpack'' majority-minority districts and to disperse those minority voters to other districts. First, the bill overturns Bossier Parish II by prohibiting voting changes enacted with ``any discriminatory purpose.'' This language bans a government official from discriminating against minority voters. If a government official could create a district that would benefit minorities, but purposely chooses not to do so because it will be majority-minority then that government official will have violated this bill.…
Source
govinfo.gov




