I support Judge Pickering because I think Judge Pickering, in the year 2002, is an appropriate nominee for the circuit court. If Charles Pickering were still a State Senator in the 1970s, I would vote against him because his civil rights record at that time was not good. But today he is a different man. This is a different time. The opposition raised against Judge Pickering, in large measure, is about what he was as a Mississippi State Senator in the 1970s. It is my hope that at a minimum we will send Judge Pickering's nomination to the floor of the Senate for a vote by the full Senate. The Constitution provides for confirmation by the Senate--not by the Senate Judiciary Committee. There are solid indicators that if Judge Pickering reached the floor, there would be 51 or more votes for his confirmation.
Arlen Specter: “I support Judge Pickering because I think Judge Pickering, in the year 2002, is an appropriate nominee for the circuit…”
On the recordMarch 8, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Judge Charles Pickering for the circuit court of appeals.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Nov 29, 2010
One other point briefly--I see a colleague awaiting an opportunity to speak--and that is my hope we will address, before the end of the year, the issue of televising the proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. This is an…
Sep 11, 2012
Congressional legislation 'doesn't amount to anything if the president can say, 'My constitutional authority supersedes the statute.'
Dec 5, 2011
The Congress, under separation of powers, has the authority to find the facts, and then there is need only for a rational relationship between what Congress finds factually and the legislation which Congress enacts.





