the subject then arose as to what were the factors related to the famous fundraiser at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple on April 29, 1996. The Vice President had received an e-mail from his scheduler asking whether there should be another stop on the April 29 itinerary on top of the ``two fundraisers in San Jose and LA.'' The Vice President responded: If we have already booked the fundraisers, then we have to decline. But the Vice President said he did not know there were any fundraisers, that the Hsi Lai Temple was a fundraiser. Then Harold Ickes sent the Vice President a memorandum on April 10 identifying the Los Angeles fundraiser which would raise $250,000 and a supplemental memorandum on April 25 saying the Los Angeles fundraiser would raise up to $325,000. Within 24 hours of receiving this memorandum, the Vice President was given briefing materials from the Democratic National Committee informing him that the DNC luncheon he would attend on April 29 was at the Buddhist temple. During the course of the event, two of the guests who ate lunch with the Vice President talked about fundraising.
Arlen Specter: “the subject then arose as to what were the factors related to the famous fundraiser at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the factors related to a fundraiser at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in 1996.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
The Court is very ideologically driven at the moment, and I think the public needs to understand that.
We have a requirement, as you may know, for 60 Senators to be in agreement before a bill is taken up, and some people--we were two votes short.
The Congress, under separation of powers, has the authority to find the facts, and then there is need only for a rational relationship between what Congress finds factually and the legislation which Congress enacts.
Because it is so important for the public to know how its Government functions, and because the Supreme Court affects the lives of Americans in such great detail.





