This was not a knee-jerk reaction to Chatsworth, and this has been something that has been a very, very long time in the making.

I am saying that is why as soon as practicable physically and, you know, not something that meets their convenience or their capital outlays or whatever.

It is clear that the Class I's aren't going to be able to meet the deadline.

Last time I checked--and someone on the panel can probably correct me--the Corps had more than a $40 billion--``b,'' billion--backlog of critical infrastructure that needed repair or replacement. That is not acceptable.

Now earmarks got a bad name. I won't go into that for various reasons. And they were banned. Well, that was stupid.

this was an attempt to restore what I always thought was a good principle, which is those who were elected from local areas better understand the needs of their constituents and their infrastructure than the main offices of the Federal…

Unfortunately, that is not shared by your Republican colleagues on the Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development Appropriations Subcommittee.

In fact, on the day of the accident, they cut $290 million from the capital budget of Amtrak.

But the bottom line is, were you allocated the money or not?

OK. So Congress denied you the money?

I certainly agree with you about the extraordinary importance to the concentrated population on the east coast of the United States on the use of this corridor on a daily basis in terms of the number of people that use it and the…

Congress has not been forthcoming. How are we going to deal with the commuter railroads?

I am looking at giving you specific authorization since it hasn't been given a priority. Why hasn't it been given a priority?

I would observe, unfortunately, here in Washington, DC, we seem to have what I call a tombstone mentality.

If we are better prepared, if we invest in resilience, if we invest in the case of the west coast and an early warning system, we can save potentially thousands of lives and billions of dollars in infrastructure and economic damages and…

For $38 million the Government of the United States of America could fund a real-time, at-sea-based early warning system.

Given what you just heard today, don't you believe that we should perhaps be investing more money in that program to deal with both early warning and other things that have just been talked about in terms of mitigation?

We want to do more than look into them.

This should be a shared responsibility to build out a robust early warning system, save lives.

That is a bit sobering.

I think everybody in the audience should clap at that point.

I delved very deeply into highway and motor carrier safety during my 4 years as chairman of the subcommittee.

We keep mandating lots of activity. And today it seems to have resulted in less clarity for the industry.

You know, the Corps is an essential agency, and I don't envy the position you are in.

I am disappointed in the administration, and I know that is not up to either of you.