Again, I appreciate the gentleman's hard work on this issue. I know we share a common goal of getting drug prices down and meeting unmet needs of cures. But, tragically, the Democrat bill, H.R. 3, is a very partisan bill. We are told by the California Life Sciences Association that, if enacted, you could see an 88 percent reduction in the number of drugs brought to market by small and emerging companies in California alone. That is their estimate. These are the people who do this work. They also estimate we would lose 80,000--that is a lot--80,000 biotech R&D jobs nationwide. That is what H.R. 3 does. So, if you are for cutting jobs in America in biotechnical research, and if you are for 88 percent fewer drugs coming to market from small and emerging innovators in California, then I guess you are going to vote for H.R. 3. I am not going to. I think we can do better. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Gottheimer). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes appeared to have it.
Share & report
More from Greg Walden
I appreciate my friend from California's comments, especially about the smoke and his sympathy for the folks all across the West, and especially in the Pacific Northwest. I am a native Oregonian and, tragically, we have been choking on…
I thank my friend and colleague from Illinois for her support of this legislation and her work on it. Once again, I urge passage of the legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
I want to thank the gentlewoman from Delaware, my friend, for her work on this and so many other pieces of legislation and our work together. We have had a good run. There is still more work to be done in the next 40-some days, but I thank…
I want to thank my colleague from Texas for his great leadership on this issue. I encourage our colleagues to vote for this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.





