let me correct one misconception that has been portrayed here on the floor, and that is that there is money earmarked in the bill for India. There is no earmark in this bill. Therefore, there is no reason for the fiscal conservatives to vote for this amendment, inasmuch as there is nothing that we are cutting. They are not cutting foreign aid by voting for this amendment, they are simply instructing the administration that they can only give so much money, but there is no earmark in this bill in the first place for India, so the fiscal conservatives can join with those of us who support the democratic regime in India and support the gentleman's view. Therefore, there is no reason for even the fiscal conservatives to vote against this issue.
James T. Callahan: “let me correct one misconception that has been portrayed here on the floor, and that is that there is money earmarked in…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing misconceptions about foreign aid earmarks in a bill related to India.
Share
More from James T. Callahan
at the same time, we do not want to leave the President of Colombia out on a limb. He has come back to us. He has told us what the problem is and we are having to fill in a void, but the void has been caused by the failure of the other…
I assure the gentlewoman that the subcommittee will continue to work with her to ensure that USAID funds on these important programs are spent.
I certainly will work with the gentleman from Ohio to try to find some legislative solution to the problems that exist with the Palestinian Authority and the gentleman's company from Ohio, because I happen to believe that the gentleman's…
I might just convey to the audience that might be watching this that this is not an obituary. I am not going to die, and I am not going to go away. I am going to be back again next year because I have no opposition; and, as a result, I am…





