Let me correct one misconception that has been portrayed here on the floor, and that is that there is money earmarked in the bill for India. There is no earmark in this bill. Therefore, there is no reason for the fiscal conservatives to vote for this amendment, inasmuch as there is nothing that we are cutting. They are not cutting foreign aid by voting for this amendment, they are simply instructing the administration that they can only give so much money, but there is no earmark in this bill in the first place for India, so the fiscal conservatives can join with those of us who support the democratic regime in India and support the gentleman's view. Therefore, there is no reason for even the fiscal conservatives to vote against this issue.
James T. Callahan: “Let me correct one misconception that has been portrayed here on the floor, and that is that there is money earmarked in…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing misconceptions about foreign aid earmarks in a bill related to India.
Share
More from James T. Callahan
Simplifying the compliance processes and procedures would provide the ability to differentiate between contractors who are intentionally underpaying workers from those who may be unintentionally non-compliant.
Reclaiming my time, we must decide on whether or not that is going to definitely be the site. Once that determination is made, there will be ample time to provide ample resources to the review board to make certain that the public is fully…
I might point out that they are already drilling now within 1 mile of the district of the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Scarborough). That is not an argument. These waters are primarily the waters within 17 miles of the beaches or offshore…
Primarily, we are talking about the assistance to Arafat, the very person that we both despise because of the atrocities he has placed upon the citizens of Israel. How in the world anybody in this House could support giving money to a…





