In the subcommittee it was only $419 and in full committee it was only $419, and when it first passed the House it was $419. Then the conferees went over to the Senate and compromised at $465, not the House, and then brought the authorization bill back to us and requested that we accept the $465.
James T. Callahan: “In the subcommittee it was only $419 and in full committee it was only $419, and when it first passed the House it was…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding amounts in the authorization bill during a committee review.
Share
More from James T. Callahan
I do know that the government of Vietnam is offering interest-free loans for people, which I think is in violation of all of our agreements, is offering interest-free loans to people to start catfish farms, and if they want to do that and…
I assure the gentlewoman that the subcommittee will continue to work with her to ensure that USAID funds on these important programs are spent.
first of all, I do not know of anyone on either side of the aisle who is opposed to helping California get out of this serious problem they are in, or any of the other Western States as well. We recognize fully that there is a crisis in…
I do understand these communities are suffering water shortages primarily because the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Everett) tells me about it every night. Every time we get in a 5-minute lull he expresses to me his serious concerns about…





