Well, the development fund for Africa was requested at $704 million. I know where the gentleman from Indiana is coming from, but my point to him, that if we take into consideration what we passed in 1996 for this current fiscal year and what we passed in this bill for 1997, that it is $63 million below the President's request and $25 million below the 1996 level. Now, we have changed the structure of the account. If we just take one of them, we might be able to find a $144 million discrepancy, but if we take all of the funds and all of the appropriations and weigh them against last year, then we are at $25 million below the 1996 level.
James T. Callahan: “Well, the development fund for Africa was requested at $704 million. I know where the gentleman from Indiana is coming…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding levels for the development fund for Africa during a budget debate.
Share
More from James T. Callahan
Primarily, we are talking about the assistance to Arafat, the very person that we both despise because of the atrocities he has placed upon the citizens of Israel. How in the world anybody in this House could support giving money to a…
The issue is the pipeline, and the issue is what is going to be put in the pipeline. The gentleman from Florida has already said that they already have pipelines going into Florida; they want to build more pipelines because they need more…
The gentleman mentioned the word ``hypocrisy,'' and the gentleman knows how opposed I am to any form of hypocrisy. If indeed it is as the gentleman says that this could imperil the drinking water of the gentleman's constituents, we will…
I might point out that they are already drilling now within 1 mile of the district of the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Scarborough). That is not an argument. These waters are primarily the waters within 17 miles of the beaches or offshore…





