It is the custom of the Committee to swear in all witnesses before they appear.
James Lankford
The Public Record
James Paul Lankford is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from Oklahoma since January 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Lankford has focused on issues such as healthcare, government spending, and religious freedom during his time in office. He previously served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 2011 to 2015, representing Oklahoma's 5th congressional district.
The Committee takes the nomination process very seriously. We are pleased to have a strong nominee before us today.
The EPA itself, I think, has said that the average cost is going to be $155,000 to alter a ditch on someone's property.
I want to thank Senator Johnson, because as Chairman of this Committee, he has tried to push these regulatory issues where we can find common ground.
Counties that build and maintain almost half the roads in the United States... are going to need a permit.
Had EPA followed Congress' direction, it would have learned that the States, not EPA, implement 96 percent of EPA's delegated programs.
The WOTUS rule has resulted in such uncertainty that 30 States and many stakeholders have filed lawsuits.
I believe that the Legislative Branch is the thumping heart of our constitutional system and it is increasingly becoming irrelevant.
My fear is that while we can reverse this trend, we are fast approaching a certain constitutional failsafe line where the administrative state will become a fixed and unassailable reality of American government.
This Administration has failed to present a comprehensive strategy in a number of areas--whether it is defeating the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) or countering the use of social media.
I am concerned that we spend a tremendous amount of time talking about decriminalizing marijuana.
Do you have any concern at all, for you, that SEC is headed toward and being directed by Congress, by the way, or by an outside entity, toward a more political position, rather than being a fair-minded arbitrator in some things to be able…
Every member of the Oklahoma delegation, as you might know, wrote to the FCC on March 25 and said, look, don't do this, because we are the vanguard when it comes to policing waste, fraud, and abuse in the system.
I appreciate all of your input, your preparation for this and being a part of this conversation today and bringing this to the national conversation.
It follows, I would submit to you, that the courts must retain the sole authority to issue binding interpretations of law.
Congress has the responsibility to be able to define this, if Congress failed on its responsibility, shouldn't Article 3 push back and say Article 1 needs to do their job?
I believe that these doctrines of deference are at war with the Constitution's separation of powers.
Congress is not doing its job because it has found a way to be able to hand off to the courts.





