Jim Inhofe

We are going to be making the request, Madam Chairman, that we go back, re-look at this.

The Supreme Court said you have three choices. You can either find an endangerment finding, or not find it, or you can say that the science is uncertain.

We are going to do the damage, inflict the economic damage to this country that would have come under cap-and-trade.

The bottom line is this. We--every effort was made going back to even before the McCain-Lieberman bills of 2003, 2005.

We have been told that the science still stands.

The EPA accepted the IPCC's erroneous claims wholesale without doing its own independent review.

This report is a primary basis for the EPA's endangerment finding for greenhouse gases.

The U.K. Telegraph, one of the largest newspapers over there, said this is most significant scientific scandal of our generation.

The U.K. government found that the scientists from the Climate Research Unit, that is the CRU, who are at the center of this scandal, violated its Freedom of Information Act.

The minority staff found that some of the world's leading climate scientists engaged in potentially illegal and unethical behaviors.

I think anyone who wants it now, as of this moment, can go to their Web site, or go to the Web site of Inhofe, what is that Web site? Inhofe.Senate.gov.

Schedule some meetings with some goals

The process in place is good

I hope they will concentrate on getting things done rapidly.

Regulatory decisionmaking should not be pressured by economic conditions.

Nuclear energy is plentiful, it is cheap, it is safe and it is clean.

I was glad to hear that President Obama is now embracing nuclear energy as crucial to our energy security and economic prosperity.

Mr. Elkins, you have your work cut out for you.

I will be supporting all of the nominees, and I look forward to working with them.

Thank you, Madam Chairman, for making last-minute adjustments to today's hearing.

Science is the key here. We should be taking the very best science.

For over 30 years TSCA has provided a scientifically sound framework for reporting, testing, tracking and restricting chemical substances and mixtures.

In almost all circumstances, the benefits of breast feeding exponentially outweigh any possible risks from the mere presence of a chemical in the milk.

Misapplying biomonitoring data only serves to scare the public and in some cases advance political agendas.

I believe that biomonitoring can be a useful tool in assessing human chemical exposures.