I urge our colleagues to vote to proceed to this appropriations bill. I cannot recall--and it may be that we have done it--somebody objecting to a motion to proceed to an appropriations bill. Maybe a couple years ago in dealing with an Interior bill, which I was actually a manager of, that had on it an issue on grazing, and there was some legislation on that bill. But I do not recall anyone objecting to proceeding to the bill, though. I have heard a couple colleagues on the other side of the aisle saying they had problems with one of the provisions in the bill relating to prohibiting President Clinton's Executive order dealing with striker replacements. If they do not like that language, if we proceed to the bill, they have the opportunity to amend it and strike that language if they have the votes. That is fine. That is the way we usually handle appropriations bills. There are some things in this appropriations bill I do not agree with and on which I plan on having an amendment. Not everything done in committee I agree with.
Don Nickles: “I urge our colleagues to vote to proceed to this appropriations bill. I cannot recall--and it may be that we have done…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the appropriations bill and the process for amendments during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Don Nickles
If somebody is activated and they go to Afghanistan or Iraq, don't they receive full health care costs without paying the 28 percent?
I have absolutely loved working in the Senate. The Senate is a great institution. It is one of the true pillars of democracy in the world, one which people look to with great respect and admiration. I have always been proud to be called a…
Yesterday the Senate completed action of the second of 13 appropriations bills for fiscal year 2005, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. Although the Senate has not yet adopted a new concurrent resolution on the…
I think it would be a disastrous mistake for the Senate if you want the Senate to be a deliberative body.





