To respond to my colleague's question, maybe it is an interesting analogy between President Bush and President Hoover. President Hoover was present when the market collapsed on that fateful day in October in 1929. President Clinton was President when the market collapsed in March of 2000. NASDAQ took a dive. The stock market took a dive and continued to dive throughout 2000. I do not want to play that game, but I am offended when I see pictures and hear those kinds of aspersions. I do not think it helps the debate. I agree with my colleague, that market crash was foretelling that we had very significant problems coming, and it resulted in a lot of lost revenue to the Government that no one projected, whether it be the White House or anybody else. I appreciate my colleague. I want to elevate the caliber of the debate and not be quite so political and quite so partisan so early.
Don Nickles: “To respond to my colleague's question, maybe it is an interesting analogy between President Bush and President Hoover.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic implications of market crashes during presidential terms.
Share
More from Don Nickles
Yesterday the Senate completed action of the second of 13 appropriations bills for fiscal year 2005, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. Although the Senate has not yet adopted a new concurrent resolution on the…
law makers must carefully distinguish between the need for tax credits which may operate as subsidies, compared to more favored tax deductions which are expensed as part of ordinary business operations.
If somebody is activated and they go to Afghanistan or Iraq, don't they receive full health care costs without paying the 28 percent?
The biggest economic boon to this country has been the explosion of oil and gas activity, primarily because of fracking.





