But the massive figure is $5 trillion over the next 20 years. Now, that is $5 trillion we have to go out and borrow and pay interest on, which I think is probably the best argument for not doing this. We should not implement a program that is going to strap our generation with massive tax increases to pay for this, the $5 trillion, the interest on the $5 trillion, and then end up with a benefit that is not guaranteed. I think when you add all that together, it is a recipe for disaster.
Tim Ryan: “But the massive figure is $5 trillion over the next 20 years. Now, that is $5 trillion we have to go out and borrow and…”
On the recordMarch 1, 2005
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of proposed changes to the Social Security system.
Share
More from Tim Ryan
Nov 16, 2022
Due to a conflict, I was not present to cast my vote on passage of S. 4524 The Speak Out Act. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 480. Members Recorded Pursuant to House Resolution 8, 117th Congress Bass…
Aug 25, 2022
If you just knew that, you'd say who's for the average working person and who's for the billionaires, and it's quite clear, and I got a long record.
Sep 15, 2022
He’s being funded by the very people who outsourced these jobs, who sent these jobs to China.
Jul 28, 2022
It is time for us to quit the politics. Stop trying to score political points. Stop putting party over country lay down our arms.





